Two MPs in the news that I have to comment on again.
Trevor Mallard first.
I didn't like the anti-scalping law. Not because I'm a scalper, I've never bought
tickets to anything without actually going to it. The law didn't concern me too much, so I just
dismissed it as a dumb idea. The two
problems I had with the law were that it offered protection to big business over
individuals, and it interfered with what should have been a free market. I'm not a big believer in free markets, but
in the case of tickets to major events, I reckon let the market run wild and
free. It's just a game (or gig), after
all.
So I don't mind anyone selling tickets on TradeMe, for
whatever reason. If people are dumb
enough to pay over the face value, stupid them, and if they have the tickets
dishonoured at the gate that's private business between the buyer and seller.
BUT
Trevor Mallard was strongly associated with the
anti-scalping legislation, more so than any MP.
It doesn't matter what he thought of the legislation, it is forever his
name linked to it. And that puts him in
the unique position of looking like (and, as far as I can see, being) a big old
hypocrite when it comes to selling tickets to sports events and gigs. Next time, Mr Mallard, give the tickets away,
or donate the proceeds to a named charity (not the un-named one that receives
"a good part" of Mr Key's salary) and limit the price to the face
value.
The final point relates to the conditions of the sale around
not reselling the tickets. I'm not convinced
that this is any more enforceable than the "Not for individual
resale" found on Coke cans in every second dairy. Perhaps someone can set the record straight.
Mojo Mathers next.
This whole idea that she's "been around
parliament" for five years, so someone should have known, ignores a whole
lot of reality.
Her employer, until she was elected, was the Green
Party. As far as we know she had no
issue with her employer providing the necessary things to support her in her
role.
Once she was elected to parliament, she left her previous
employment and now works for the citizens of New Zealand, as an MP. Her previous employer cannot be expected to
continue to provide for her, nor can they be expected to pass on to her new
employer anything they used to support her in her previous role.
The Speaker must fund facilities to allow every deaf MP
(including those to come), irrespective of their political hue, to participate to
the fullest of their ability, which will undoubtedly be more than the ability
of the most dim-witted of the non-deaf MPs.
No comments:
Post a Comment